-2.0%
XLC vs UMAC
+129.0%
-131.1%
-11.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -2.5% | +3.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -3.4% | +3.9% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -15.1% | +17.2% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +0.7% | -10.8% | +11.5% | +0.8% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +15.7% | -18.9% | -4.5% |
| YTD | -3.8% | +80.1% | -83.9% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | -2.0% | +116.7% | -118.7% | -5.9% |
| All | -2.0% | +129.0% | -131.1% | -5.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling