+68.7%
XLC vs SPXS
-79.5%
+148.1%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.4% | -2.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +1.2% | -2.7% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +5.2% | -6.1% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -0.3% | -9.2% | +8.8% | -2.5% |
| 6M | -5.2% | -29.6% | +24.4% | -13.3% |
| YTD | -5.3% | -27.6% | +22.3% | -12.4% |
| 1Y | -2.8% | -36.7% | +33.9% | -13.2% |
| All | +68.7% | -79.5% | +148.1% | +11.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling