+69.7%
XLC vs NVS
+54.6%
+15.1%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -15.7% | +14.0% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -11.1% | +11.3% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +0.7% | -7.2% | +7.9% | +1.1% |
| 6M | -4.5% | -12.3% | +7.9% | -3.6% |
| YTD | -4.7% | +2.8% | -7.5% | -5.4% |
| 1Y | -1.5% | +11.9% | -13.4% | -3.2% |
| All | +69.7% | +54.6% | +15.1% | +61.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling