+72.7%
XLC vs NIO
-64.6%
+137.3%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -1.6% | +0.4% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -13.0% | +12.2% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +1.0% | -18.3% | +19.3% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -33.2% | +32.5% | +1.5% |
| 6M | -5.1% | -21.5% | +16.3% | -4.1% |
| YTD | -4.3% | -25.5% | +21.2% | -3.1% |
| 1Y | -0.6% | -38.0% | +37.4% | +1.4% |
| All | +72.7% | -64.6% | +137.3% | +75.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling