+69.7%
XLC vs MCO
+40.3%
+29.4%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -1.5% | +2.1% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -7.3% | +5.7% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -1.7% | +1.9% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +0.7% | +3.9% | -3.2% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -4.5% | +3.8% | -8.3% | -6.1% |
| YTD | -4.7% | -7.9% | +3.2% | -2.3% |
| 1Y | -1.5% | -6.8% | +5.4% | +0.2% |
| All | +69.7% | +40.3% | +29.4% | +46.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling