+68.7%
XLC vs INSM
+390.5%
-321.8%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INSM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +3.1% | -3.7% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +1.7% | -3.1% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -4.4% | +3.5% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +30.0% | -30.4% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -5.2% | -10.0% | +4.8% | -5.2% |
| YTD | -5.3% | -26.0% | +20.7% | -4.9% |
| 1Y | -2.8% | -12.5% | +9.7% | -2.9% |
| All | +68.7% | +390.5% | -321.8% | +66.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INSM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INSM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INSM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INSM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling