+61.0%
XLC vs ILMN
+88.1%
-27.1%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ILMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +2.5% | -2.0% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -9.7% | +14.6% | +5.8% |
| 30D | -5.8% | -20.4% | +14.6% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -5.4% | +10.0% | -15.5% | -7.2% |
| 6M | -10.2% | +49.5% | -59.7% | -15.1% |
| YTD | -10.2% | +62.5% | -72.7% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +76.0% | -81.6% | -13.0% |
| 3Y | +61.0% | +94.2% | -33.2% | +43.5% |
| All | +61.0% | +88.1% | -27.1% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ILMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ILMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ILMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ILMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling