+73.6%
XLC vs FDS
-27.1%
+100.6%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -3.5% | +2.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.9% | +1.1% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +1.0% | +9.0% | -8.0% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +18.9% | -19.5% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +35.1% | -40.3% | -10.2% |
| YTD | -4.3% | +5.5% | -9.8% | -4.5% |
| 1Y | -0.6% | -16.8% | +16.2% | +6.1% |
| All | +73.6% | -27.1% | +100.6% | +88.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling