+68.7%
XLC vs BHP
+81.6%
-13.0%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +0.3% | -0.9% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +0.9% | -2.3% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +4.0% | -4.9% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +11.3% | -11.6% | -3.1% |
| 6M | -5.2% | +29.3% | -34.5% | -11.7% |
| YTD | -5.3% | +59.2% | -64.5% | -17.2% |
| 1Y | -2.8% | +80.8% | -83.7% | -18.4% |
| All | +68.7% | +81.6% | -13.0% | +34.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling