+142.5%
XLC vs ACM
+109.9%
+32.6%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.4% | -0.8% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -3.7% | +2.9% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +1.0% | -11.1% | +12.2% | +4.7% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -8.0% | +7.3% | +1.4% |
| 6M | -5.1% | -29.7% | +24.5% | +6.0% |
| YTD | -4.3% | -29.4% | +25.1% | +6.1% |
| 1Y | -0.6% | -46.4% | +45.9% | +21.4% |
| 3Y | +72.7% | -22.3% | +95.0% | +80.1% |
| 5Y | +38.0% | +4.5% | +33.5% | +27.2% |
| All | +142.5% | +109.9% | +32.6% | +55.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling