+61.0%
XLC vs ACGL
+31.5%
+29.5%
-18.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -3.0% | +3.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -5.8% | +13.7% | -19.5% | -7.6% |
| 3M | -5.4% | +8.0% | -13.5% | -6.6% |
| 6M | -10.2% | +13.3% | -23.5% | -11.9% |
| YTD | -10.2% | +11.8% | -22.0% | -11.9% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +22.2% | -27.9% | -8.8% |
| 3Y | +61.0% | +32.5% | +28.5% | +57.2% |
| All | +61.0% | +31.5% | +29.5% | +57.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling