+31.4%
XLB vs MCK
+112.3%
-80.9%
-23.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -2.9% | +0.1% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -3.1% | +0.4% | -3.5% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -0.2% | +12.1% | -12.3% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +3.1% | -5.4% | +8.5% | +3.3% |
| YTD | +13.3% | +7.8% | +5.5% | +13.3% |
| 1Y | +12.0% | +22.9% | -10.9% | +11.3% |
| 3Y | +31.4% | +110.7% | -79.3% | +32.2% |
| All | +31.4% | +112.3% | -80.9% | +32.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling