+43.2%
XLB vs ARMK
+96.6%
-53.4%
-23.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +0.1% | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.5% | +2.7% | -2.1% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +5.2% | -1.5% | +6.6% | +5.3% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -11.6% | +11.9% | +3.5% |
| 6M | +1.2% | +6.7% | -5.6% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +16.6% | +47.4% | -30.8% | +2.5% |
| 1Y | +21.4% | +41.5% | -20.0% | +8.0% |
| 3Y | +43.2% | +95.5% | -52.3% | +18.8% |
| All | +43.2% | +96.6% | -53.4% | +18.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling