+3.5%
XHB vs UMAC
+549.5%
-546.0%
-30.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +9.3% | -11.8% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +14.7% | -14.5% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -0.5% | -8.6% | -9.2% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +0.5% | -2.8% | -2.8% |
| 6M | -4.1% | +57.9% | -62.1% | -6.5% |
| YTD | -1.7% | +103.9% | -105.6% | -5.2% |
| 1Y | -15.1% | +159.3% | -174.4% | -19.1% |
| All | +3.5% | +549.5% | -546.0% | -10.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling