+163.4%
WWD vs PFGC
+61.7%
+101.7%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.2% | +0.7% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -3.7% | +4.4% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -16.0% | +10.9% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -11.2% | -4.1% | -7.1% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -12.0% | +8.7% | -20.7% | -15.4% |
| YTD | +12.0% | +6.4% | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| 1Y | +42.8% | -8.4% | +51.2% | +44.6% |
| All | +163.4% | +61.7% | +101.7% | +119.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling