-16.9%
WWD vs NIO
-41.8%
+24.9%
-30.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +5.9% | -2.5% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +5.6% | -1.5% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -2.1% | -4.2% | +2.1% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -13.2% | -26.3% | +13.1% | -14.3% |
| 6M | -16.9% | -42.5% | +25.7% | -18.4% |
| All | -16.9% | -41.8% | +24.9% | -18.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling