+23.7%
WULF vs ZTS
-38.1%
+61.8%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.3% | -3.7% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +15.6% | -3.8% | +19.3% | +15.5% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -2.0% | +7.8% | +5.6% |
| 3M | -32.3% | -10.2% | -22.1% | -30.3% |
| 6M | +23.7% | -39.4% | +63.1% | +61.3% |
| All | +23.7% | -38.1% | +61.8% | +61.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling