-45.4%
WULF vs Z
-23.8%
-21.6%
-65.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | Z | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +3.5% | -6.7% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +0.8% | +10.1% | +11.2% |
| 30D | +9.4% | +5.2% | +4.2% | +11.3% |
| 3M | -22.6% | -17.0% | -5.6% | -26.2% |
| 6M | -45.4% | -22.7% | -22.8% | -43.2% |
| All | -45.4% | -23.8% | -21.6% | -43.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside Z.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus Z return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × Z return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded Z wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling