+57.3%
WULF vs VICR
+293.8%
-236.4%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +11.2% | -7.4% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +5.0% | -3.6% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -12.5% | +9.9% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -34.0% | -33.6% | -0.4% | -25.3% |
| 6M | +10.0% | +10.7% | -0.7% | +4.5% |
| YTD | +45.7% | +80.6% | -34.9% | +32.2% |
| 1Y | +57.3% | +288.4% | -231.0% | +45.0% |
| All | +57.3% | +293.8% | -236.4% | +45.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling