-55.8%
WULF vs USB
+7.8%
-63.7%
-65.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | USB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +12.8% | -0.5% | +13.3% | +12.7% |
| 7D | -3.1% | 0.0% | -3.1% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -21.0% | +5.8% | -26.9% | -20.6% |
| 3M | -35.5% | -6.0% | -29.5% | -36.1% |
| 6M | -55.8% | +7.8% | -63.6% | -56.3% |
| All | -55.8% | +7.8% | -63.7% | -56.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside USB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus USB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × USB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded USB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling