+901.8%
WULF vs RCAT
+738.1%
+163.6%
-74.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RCAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -6.5% | +2.4% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +15.6% | -2.3% | +17.9% | +16.3% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -18.7% | +24.4% | +10.9% |
| 3M | -32.3% | -29.3% | -3.0% | -27.2% |
| 6M | +23.7% | -42.3% | +66.0% | +34.4% |
| YTD | +49.1% | +2.5% | +46.6% | +41.2% |
| 1Y | +66.3% | -5.7% | +72.0% | +56.7% |
| All | +901.8% | +738.1% | +163.6% | +551.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RCAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RCAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RCAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RCAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling