-45.4%
WULF vs PCG
-19.7%
-25.7%
-65.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +2.2% | -5.4% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +2.2% | +8.8% | +10.5% |
| 30D | +9.4% | +0.8% | +8.6% | +9.1% |
| 3M | -22.6% | -23.8% | +1.2% | -21.0% |
| 6M | -45.4% | -19.6% | -25.8% | -42.6% |
| All | -45.4% | -19.7% | -25.7% | -42.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling