+878.9%
WULF vs NOC
+28.9%
+850.1%
-74.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | 0.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +0.8% | +0.6% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -9.7% | +7.1% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -34.0% | -5.6% | -28.3% | -34.4% |
| 6M | +10.0% | -28.6% | +38.6% | +4.2% |
| YTD | +45.7% | -7.9% | +53.6% | +45.9% |
| 1Y | +57.3% | -9.5% | +66.9% | +57.0% |
| 3Y | +878.9% | +28.4% | +850.6% | +1,023.0% |
| All | +878.9% | +28.9% | +850.1% | +1,023.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling