+86.1%
WULF vs NOC
-10.0%
+96.2%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -2.5% | +4.2% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -5.2% | +12.7% | +8.0% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -7.2% | -1.4% | -8.3% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -5.1% | -31.9% | -36.7% |
| 6M | +7.4% | -31.1% | +38.5% | +20.7% |
| YTD | +43.7% | -8.6% | +52.3% | +37.9% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | -9.7% | +95.9% | +98.6% |
| All | +86.1% | -10.0% | +96.2% | +98.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling