-22.6%
WULF vs NIO
-35.1%
+12.5%
-43.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -4.9% | +1.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +11.0% | -14.5% | +25.4% | +27.4% |
| 30D | +9.4% | -15.0% | +24.3% | +26.2% |
| 3M | -22.6% | -35.6% | +12.9% | +7.8% |
| All | -22.6% | -35.1% | +12.5% | +7.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling