+10.0%
WULF vs LHX
-31.0%
+41.0%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LHX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -1.1% | +4.9% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -4.3% | +5.6% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -15.1% | +12.5% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -34.0% | -21.0% | -13.0% | -35.9% |
| 6M | +10.0% | -32.0% | +42.0% | +28.0% |
| All | +10.0% | -31.0% | +41.0% | +28.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LHX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LHX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LHX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LHX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling