+878.9%
WULF vs INSM
+392.8%
+486.1%
-74.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INSM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +1.7% | +2.0% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.5% | -1.1% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -2.2% | -0.4% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -34.0% | +33.8% | -67.8% | -37.8% |
| 6M | +10.0% | -7.2% | +17.2% | +9.7% |
| YTD | +45.7% | -25.6% | +71.3% | +50.0% |
| 1Y | +57.3% | -11.2% | +68.6% | +57.1% |
| 3Y | +878.9% | +388.3% | +490.6% | +880.8% |
| All | +878.9% | +392.8% | +486.1% | +880.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INSM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INSM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INSM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INSM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling