+23.7%
WULF vs HIMS
+20.2%
+3.5%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HIMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.0% | -3.1% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +15.6% | -2.7% | +18.3% | +16.6% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -12.2% | +17.9% | +9.9% |
| 3M | -32.3% | -3.7% | -28.6% | -31.9% |
| 6M | +23.7% | +25.9% | -2.2% | +15.6% |
| All | +23.7% | +20.2% | +3.5% | +15.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HIMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HIMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HIMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HIMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling