+57.3%
WULF vs GFS
+47.5%
+9.8%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +2.2% | +1.6% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +3.8% | -2.5% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -11.7% | +9.1% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -34.0% | -41.8% | +7.8% | -14.6% |
| 6M | +10.0% | +6.6% | +3.3% | +7.1% |
| YTD | +45.7% | +34.6% | +11.0% | +26.6% |
| 1Y | +57.3% | +46.2% | +11.2% | +40.0% |
| All | +57.3% | +47.5% | +9.8% | +40.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling