-45.4%
WULF vs FPS
-49.2%
+3.8%
-65.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FPS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -0.1% | -3.1% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +13.6% | -2.6% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +9.4% | -32.4% | +41.7% | +35.3% |
| 3M | -22.6% | -41.1% | +18.5% | +3.8% |
| 6M | -45.4% | -51.4% | +6.0% | -21.1% |
| All | -45.4% | -49.2% | +3.8% | -21.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FPS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FPS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FPS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FPS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling