+57.3%
WULF vs FANG
+52.7%
+4.7%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -0.2% | +3.9% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.9% | -1.5% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -2.6% | +2.6% | -5.2% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -34.0% | +7.6% | -41.5% | -31.9% |
| 6M | +10.0% | +17.3% | -7.3% | +17.3% |
| YTD | +45.7% | +38.7% | +7.0% | +57.7% |
| 1Y | +57.3% | +51.6% | +5.7% | +87.8% |
| All | +57.3% | +52.7% | +4.7% | +87.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling