+7.4%
WULF vs DECK
-21.9%
+29.3%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +1.6% | +0.2% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -2.2% | +9.8% | +8.0% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -13.6% | +5.0% | -5.1% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -21.2% | -15.7% | -31.4% |
| 6M | +7.4% | -21.1% | +28.5% | +17.0% |
| All | +7.4% | -21.9% | +29.3% | +17.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling