+32.0%
WST vs ZCMD
-99.7%
+131.6%
-10.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -4.6% | +4.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -2.9% | +7.8% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +10.7% | -28.5% | +39.1% | +10.6% |
| 3M | +16.8% | -56.5% | +73.4% | +16.6% |
| 6M | +32.0% | -99.7% | +131.6% | +32.8% |
| All | +32.0% | -99.7% | +131.6% | +32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling