+101.9%
WMT vs NVT
+190.9%
-89.0%
-23.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +4.6% | -3.3% | +1.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +4.1% | -4.1% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -7.4% | -5.1% | -2.3% | -7.3% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -1.2% | -9.7% | -10.9% |
| 6M | -12.7% | +46.6% | -59.3% | -15.3% |
| YTD | -3.2% | +60.0% | -63.2% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | +5.3% | +70.8% | -65.5% | +0.3% |
| 3Y | +101.9% | +187.5% | -85.7% | +71.5% |
| All | +101.9% | +190.9% | -89.0% | +71.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling