+107.0%
WMT vs LDOS
+39.7%
+67.2%
-23.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.5% | -1.7% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -5.4% | +9.3% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +4.9% | -9.3% | -4.8% |
| 3M | -8.8% | +7.2% | -16.0% | -9.6% |
| 6M | -15.6% | -24.2% | +8.6% | -13.9% |
| YTD | -3.2% | -25.8% | +22.6% | -1.2% |
| 1Y | +7.0% | -24.7% | +31.8% | +8.9% |
| All | +107.0% | +39.7% | +67.2% | +101.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling