+101.9%
WMT vs EBAY
+159.1%
-57.3%
-23.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +2.6% | -1.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +4.2% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -7.4% | +5.6% | -13.1% | -8.0% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -1.4% | -9.5% | -10.8% |
| 6M | -12.7% | +18.2% | -30.9% | -14.4% |
| YTD | -3.2% | +24.8% | -28.1% | -5.8% |
| 1Y | +5.3% | +18.0% | -12.8% | +2.7% |
| 3Y | +101.9% | +160.3% | -58.4% | +72.9% |
| All | +101.9% | +159.1% | -57.3% | +72.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling