+146.1%
WMB vs UMAC
+494.0%
-347.9%
-12.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -3.1% | +3.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -0.9% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +3.3% | -7.7% | +10.9% | +3.3% |
| 3M | +3.1% | -26.4% | +29.6% | +3.3% |
| 6M | -0.7% | +61.9% | -62.6% | -2.1% |
| YTD | +25.2% | +86.5% | -61.3% | +22.9% |
| 1Y | +32.9% | +156.3% | -123.4% | +29.4% |
| All | +146.1% | +494.0% | -347.9% | +134.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling