+296.4%
WMB vs NIO
-36.7%
+333.1%
-66.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -13.0% | +13.6% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +3.3% | -18.3% | +21.5% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +3.1% | -33.2% | +36.3% | +5.4% |
| 6M | -0.7% | -21.5% | +20.8% | +0.2% |
| YTD | +25.2% | -25.5% | +50.7% | +26.5% |
| 1Y | +32.9% | -38.0% | +70.9% | +35.3% |
| 3Y | +140.6% | -65.5% | +206.0% | +147.5% |
| 5Y | +273.5% | -90.6% | +364.0% | +301.6% |
| All | +296.4% | -36.7% | +333.1% | +247.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling