+141.9%
WMB vs AZO
+10.0%
+131.9%
-12.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.2% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -3.6% | +2.5% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -5.6% | +5.1% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +3.2% | -6.6% | +9.9% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +0.1% | -22.5% | +22.6% | +3.4% |
| YTD | +23.9% | -15.2% | +39.0% | +25.9% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | -33.9% | +61.5% | +35.1% |
| 3Y | +141.9% | +11.8% | +130.1% | +132.9% |
| All | +141.9% | +10.0% | +131.9% | +132.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling