+49.3%
WM vs NIO
-62.1%
+111.4%
-18.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -3.0% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -3.6% | +8.1% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +16.1% | -8.0% | +24.1% | +15.8% |
| 3M | +8.0% | -31.2% | +39.2% | +7.1% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -45.8% | +54.2% | +7.0% |
| YTD | +11.2% | -37.3% | +48.5% | +10.2% |
| 1Y | +22.3% | -56.1% | +78.4% | +21.0% |
| All | +49.3% | -62.1% | +111.4% | +47.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling