+139.3%
WFC vs WAT
+50.1%
+89.2%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | WAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.0% | +1.9% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -1.3% | +5.1% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +2.3% | -0.9% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +10.9% | +8.7% | +2.1% | +9.1% |
| 6M | +8.4% | +28.3% | -19.9% | +3.1% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +7.8% | -9.7% | -4.0% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | +36.6% | -24.3% | +4.5% |
| All | +139.3% | +50.1% | +89.2% | +112.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside WAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus WAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × WAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded WAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling