+133.3%
WFC vs SPXL
+220.2%
-86.9%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -1.4% | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -1.3% | +1.7% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -5.0% | +7.5% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +10.0% | +7.6% | +2.4% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +33.6% | -18.5% | +3.0% |
| YTD | -2.2% | +28.1% | -30.3% | -11.3% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | +43.6% | -30.2% | -1.5% |
| All | +133.3% | +220.2% | -86.9% | +53.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling