+11.7%
WFC vs DECK
-10.6%
+22.3%
-11.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | +6.0% | -3.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +4.5% | +10.4% | -5.9% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +7.4% | +11.1% | -3.7% | +5.5% |
| 3M | -0.5% | -10.8% | +10.3% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -8.7% | +20.4% | +10.9% |
| All | +11.7% | -10.6% | +22.3% | +10.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling