+132.9%
WFC vs ABCL
+104.5%
+28.5%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.2% | +2.1% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +0.7% | +3.1% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +93.1% | -91.6% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +10.9% | +79.4% | -68.6% | +4.3% |
| 6M | +8.4% | +214.9% | -206.4% | -4.4% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +234.2% | -236.1% | -14.8% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | +174.8% | -162.4% | -1.4% |
| All | +132.9% | +104.5% | +28.5% | +78.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling