+198.7%
WELL vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+298.7%
-13.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +4.0% | -4.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -4.1% | +3.0% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -22.7% | +23.5% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +14.5% | -62.5% | +77.0% | +14.8% |
| 6M | +14.4% | -99.5% | +113.9% | +17.2% |
| YTD | +28.5% | -99.7% | +128.2% | +31.8% |
| 1Y | +41.8% | -99.9% | +141.7% | +45.9% |
| All | +198.7% | -100.0% | +298.7% | +197.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling