+203.3%
WELL vs FITB
+132.2%
+71.2%
-13.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -0.2% | -1.9% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +0.6% | -1.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -4.7% | +4.7% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +18.0% | +6.7% | +11.4% | +16.8% |
| 6M | +15.0% | +12.6% | +2.4% | +12.9% |
| YTD | +28.6% | +19.1% | +9.5% | +24.8% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | +22.6% | +20.3% | +37.7% |
| All | +203.3% | +132.2% | +71.2% | +144.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling