+770.0%
WDC vs NIO
-60.1%
+830.1%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.0% | -4.9% | -0.1% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +12.1% | -14.5% | +26.5% | +15.3% |
| 30D | -18.8% | -15.0% | -3.8% | -16.4% |
| 3M | -39.3% | -35.6% | -3.8% | -34.4% |
| 6M | -40.1% | -55.7% | +15.5% | -31.3% |
| YTD | +71.8% | -43.1% | +114.9% | +88.5% |
| 1Y | +88.5% | -53.5% | +142.0% | +112.5% |
| 3Y | +770.0% | -59.8% | +829.8% | +855.2% |
| All | +770.0% | -60.1% | +830.1% | +855.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling