+815.8%
WDC vs BIIB
+12.2%
+803.6%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.2% | +0.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +16.3% | +2.7% | +13.6% | +15.7% |
| 30D | -18.3% | +9.4% | -27.7% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -31.4% | +19.9% | -51.4% | -33.8% |
| 6M | -36.3% | +25.6% | -61.9% | -39.9% |
| YTD | +80.8% | +42.3% | +38.5% | +63.4% |
| 1Y | +87.7% | +55.1% | +32.6% | +64.9% |
| All | +815.8% | +12.2% | +803.6% | +695.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling