+186.0%
WBD vs PLTU
+196.3%
-10.2%
-38.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| 7D | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| 30D | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| 3M | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| 6M | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| YTD | +39.5% | -27.8% | +67.3% | +41.5% |
| 1Y | +63.0% | -22.0% | +85.0% | +61.8% |
| All | +186.0% | +196.3% | -10.2% | +112.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling