+48.1%
WAT vs ABCL
+104.5%
-56.3%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.2% | +0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +0.7% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +93.1% | -90.7% | -6.3% |
| 3M | +8.7% | +79.4% | -70.7% | -0.2% |
| 6M | +28.3% | +214.9% | -186.6% | +9.1% |
| YTD | +7.8% | +234.2% | -226.4% | -9.8% |
| 1Y | +36.6% | +174.8% | -138.2% | +16.1% |
| All | +48.1% | +104.5% | -56.3% | +31.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling